Texans - Vote for Hillary

National Security III - Texans, Vote for Hillary.

In the face of the combination primary/caucus contest in Texas March 4 Clinton rightly questions the ability of her opponent to respond properly to matters of national security. Certainly every indication is that Obama is indeed far out of his league in this department. Isn’t the selection of the commander-in-chief a major responsibility because the protection of one’s family is a major responsibility? Hillary, despite her history of personal destruction, petty theft and major scandal is still semi-grounded on national affairs (Well, ok, the little woman’s been fighting for change at the highest levels for 35 years and hasn’t accomplished a damn thing; she’s a thinly disguised end-run around the 22nd amendment on behalf of her husband, and a willing helpmeet in what’s basically an international criminal enterprise based in Hot Springs, Ark but so what?) and we think has some sense of the incorrigibility of muslim medievalists. But Obama truly believes, if one listens, that this is just one big misunderstanding and as we highlighted earlier, one that can be resolved through talk, appeasement, global anti-poverty programs and a sincere effort to make ourselves inoffensive to those sworn to destroy us.

Most retired officers, industry executives and current defense officials cite Obama's lack of experience in national security. Republicans and not just a few Democrats are very seriously worried. They also point to his determination to pull American combat units from Iraq at a time when a troop surge has reduced violence, damaged al Qaeda and allowed the Iraqi government to progress toward Sunni-Shia-Kurd reconciliation. "We're very concerned about his apparent lack of understanding on the threat of radical Islam to the United States," said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney.

Apparently Obama is not well versed in history. Beyond Iraq, Iran looms largest in the matter of national security and anyone who may not realize that has been living under a rock, or, suffers from chronic lassitude and indifference. There are many of these, in fact roughly one third of the population. This was just as true during the American Revolution as it is now. One third of the colonists could not be bothered, one third were loyalists and one third were patriots. A combination of miracles pulled us through that one PLUS the fact that by 1775 and certainly 1776 ALL revolutionary leaders realized that appeasement and compromise would gain nothing with the Brits. So we did not have that handicap. If there were a B.H. Obama in place of Samuel Adams there would be no United States, or at least not then. And as George Washington set about steering an infant country, his wisdom that, "There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation," has provided a cornerstone for every diplomatic effort or success then or since.

Obama is Neville Chamberlain. He is Bambi amongst the most nefarious group of individuals the modern world has ever known. Huckabee shared this with Obama but Huckabee is history. Obama must also travel that course. Vote for Hillary!
Robert Craven